IV.COMPARISON BETWEEN THE LIABILITY OF THE HEAD OF THE FAMILY AND THE LIABILITY OF EMPLOYERS
The liability of the head of the family is both similar and different from the liability…
“An employer is liable for the damage caused by his employees in the performance of their work.…
An employer will not be held liable if he proves that he took all due care in the selection of the employees, in giving instructions regarding the work, and in the process of inspection and supervision in order to avoid damage from occurrence.…
The employer employing people in an enterprise will be held liable for the compensation of the damage occured as a result of the activities of that enterprise unless he proves that the working order of the enterprise is convenient enough to prevent the damage from happening.…
The employer has a right of recourse against the person who caused the damage to the extent that such person is liable in damages.”…
According to Art. 66 of the TCO, the damage injuring the third party must occur during…
In the liability of the head of the family, the damage caused does not neccessarily…
Furthermore in the liability of the head of the family, if the head of the family…
It is much easier to bring an exonerating proof for the head of the family than to…
What happens when the head of the family and the employer are different people during…
However this should be kept in mind that; even though the conditions to be fullfilled…
EN
TR
LEXI size zaman kazandırır. Sonuç analizi, doküman asistanı ve araştırma modlarıyla LEXPERA içeriğine erişiminizi kolaylaştırır.
