“Article 6 § 2 is aimed at preventing the undermining of a fair criminal trial by prejudicial statements made in close connection with those proceedings. Where no such proceedings are or have been in existence, statements attributing criminal or other reprehensible conduct are more relevant to considerations of protection against defamation and adequate access to court to determine civil rights, raising potential issues under Articles 8 and 6 of the Convention. …
To round up, the presumption of innocence applies formally only in the last stage…
The main conflicting issue to be highlighted here is (as usual in connection with…
In the jurisdiction of the ECtHR the creation of suspicion is one of the main themes…
***…
The concept of human rights and their further development is necessary as – we know…
Thereby, I argue for non-application of algorithmic systems within the criminal justice…
