Condemned To Be A Criminal. The Debate On Criminal Responsibility: From 19th Century italian Legal Science To Neuroscience

Neurolaw(138) approaches could therefore be multiple, with neuroscience findings influencing legislation. However, not all experts agree that there is a need for greater integration of neuroscience and law reform, and it should be noted that not all neuroscientific findings appear to be accepted and indisputable, which ultimately discredits the findings themselves, especially given the speed at which neuroscience is changing so that today’s innovative result appears outdated tomorrow. Furthermore, it is difficult to understand where «we draw the line between person-to-person variation and a serious abnormality that caused a crime to be committed»(139);…

3. Neurointervention like crime prevetion…