MAKALELER
Adams-Prassl, A., & Adams-Prassl, J. ‘Systemic Unfairness, Access to Justice and Futility: A Framework’ (2020) 40(3) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 561–590
Adanbekova ZN and others, ‘Features of the Conclusion of a Civil Transaction on the Internet’ (2022) 14(1) International Journal of Electronic Security and Digital Forensics 19-36
Amro I, ‘The Challenges Facing the Use of a Machine Arbitrator as an Application of Artificial Intelligence in Theory and in Practice’ (2022) 25(5) Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues 1-10
Amro I, ‘The Resolution of Consumer Disputes Through Online Arbitration’ (2016) 82(3) Arbitration: The International Journal of Arbitration, Mediation and Dispute Management 265-280
Amro I, ‘The Use of Online Mediation in the Resolution of Civil and Commercial Disputes in Theory and in Practice’ (2021) 87(2) Arbitration: The International Journal of Arbitration, Mediation and Dispute Management 204-222
Sayfa 316
Alexander N and Jun Kang AL, ‘Das Neue ODR-Rahmenwerk der APEC als Wegbereiter für Internationale Online-Streitbeilegung, (2022) 25(6) Zeitchrift für Konfliktmanagement 208-212
Alkon C and Schmitz AJ, ‘Opening A Virtual Window to Expand Access to Justice in Criminal Cases’ 2024 25 Cardozo Journal Conflict Resolution, 177-228
Allen DWE, Lane AM and Poblet M, ‘The Governance of Blockchain Dispute Resolution’ (2019) 25 Harvard Negotiation Law Review 75-101
Anderson DQ, ‘Ethical Concerns in Court-Connected Online Dispute Resolution’ (2018) 5(1–2) International Journal of Online Dispute Resolution 20-38
Aouidef Y and others, ‘Decentralized Justice: A Comparative Analysis of Blockchain Online Dispute Resolution Projects’ (2021) 4 Frontiers in Blockchain 1-8
Atsushi WH, ‘Optimising Mediation for Intellectual Property Law: Perspectives from EU, French and UK Law’ (2018) 49(4) IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 384-412
Barnett J and Treleaven P, ‘Algorithmic Dispute Resolution: The Automation of Professional Dispute Resolution Using AI and Blockchain Technologies’ (2018) 61(3) The Computer Journal 399-408
Beebeejaun Z and Faccia A, ‘Electronic Alternative Dispute Resolution, Smart Contracts and Equity in the Energy Sector’ (2022) 15(2) Journal of World Energy Law & Business 97-113
Bergolla L, Self K and Eken C, ‘Kleros: A Socio-Legal Case Study of Decentralized Justice & Blockchain Arbitration’ (2021) 17(1) Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 55-90
Bookman PK and Shanahan CF, ‘A Tale Of Two Civil Procedures’ (2022) 122(5) Columbia Law Review 1183-1242
Boscheinen-Duursma HC and Khanyk-Pospolitak R, ‘Austria and Ukraine Comparative Study of E-Justice: Towards Confidence of Judicial Rights Protection’ (2019) 4(5) Access to Justice in Eastern Europe 42-59
Buchwald M, ‘Smart Contract Dispute Resolution: The Inescapable Flaws of Blockchain-Based Arbitration’ (2020) 168(5) University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1369-1423
Bürgin A, ‘Compliance with European Union Environmental Law: An Analysis of Digitalization Effects on Institutional Capacities’ (2020) 30(1) Environmental Policy and Governance 46-56
Sayfa 317
Caruso D and others, ‘The Automation Paradox in Litigation: The Inadequacy of Procedure and Evidence Law to Manage Electronic Evidence Generated by the Internet of Things in Civil Disputes’ (2019) 19 Macquarie Law Journal 157-188
Cashman P and Ginnivan E, ‘Digital Justice: Online Resolution of Minor Civil Disputes and the Use of Digital Technology in Complex Litigation and Class Actions’ (2019) 19 Macquarie Law Journal 39-79
Cao ZX, ‘Online Dispute Resolution Mechanism in China: Principle of Proceedings and Impact of Technologies’ (2022) 8(1) China and WTO Review 29-61
Carrington PD, ‘Virtual Civil Litigation: A Visit to John Bunyan’s Celestial City’ (1998) 98(6) Columbia Law Review 1516-1537
Cashman P and Ginnivan E, ‘Digital Justice: Online Resolution of Minor Civil Disputes and the Use of Digital Technology in Complex Litigation and Class Actions’ (2019) 19 Macquarie Law Journal 39-79
Cong LW and He Z, ‘Blockchain Disruption and Smart Contracts’ (2019) 32(5) The Review of Financial Studies 1754-1797
Contini F, ‘Artificial Intelligence and the Transformation of Humans, Law and Technology Interactions in Judicial Proceedings’ (2020) 2(1) Law, Technology and Humans 4-18
Cortes P, ‘Artificial Intelligence in Dispute Resolution: Special Briefing’ (2024) 30(5) Computers and Telecommunications Law Review 118-126.
Cortés P, ‘The English Court: A Research Proposal for Its A Evaluaiton’ (2022) 9(2) International Journal of Online Dispute Resolution, 138-144.
EN
TR
