4.Conclusion
Although the ECHR abounds in norms of a negative type, while only occasionally can…
REFERENCES…
1. Al-Skeini & others vs United Kingdom 2011, 55721/07.…
2. Armani da Silva vs United Kingdom 2016, 5878/08.…
3. Barthold vs Germany 1985, 8734/79.…
4. Bljakaj & others vs Croatia 2015, 74448/12.…
5. Branko Tomašić & others vs Croatia 2009, 46598/06.…
6.Choudhry, S. & Herring J. (2006). Domestic Violence and the Human Rights Act, 1998: A New Means of Legal Intervention?…
7.Derenčinović, D. & Getoš, A.-M. (2008). Uvod u kriminologiju s osnovama kaznenog prava. University…
8. Đurđević vs Croatia 2011, 52442/09.…
9. Eremia vs Moldova 2013, 3564/11.…
10.Filipović, H. (2019). “Predvidljivost događaja“ u judikaturi Europskog suda za ljudska prava.…
11.Gelles, R.J. & Straw, M.A. (2002). Determinants of Violence In The Family: Toward A Theoretical Integration.…
12. Giuliani & Gaggio vs Italy 2011, 23458/02.…
13.Güler, T.S. (2017). Positive Obligations’ Doctrine of the European Court of Human Rights: Is it Cogent or Obscure?. European…
14.Istanbul Convention (2011). Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence. CETS…
15. J.I. vs Croatia 2022, 35898/16.…
16.Klatt, M. (2011). Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights. Zeitschrift…
17. Kontrová vs Slovakia 2007, 7510/04.…
18.Krapac, D. (2010). Nezakoniti dokazi u kaznenom postupku prema praksi Europskog suda za ljudska prava. Collected…
19.Lavrysen, L. (2014). Protection by the Law: The Positive Obligation to Develop a Legal Framework to Adequately Protect ECHR Rights.…
20.Lestas, G. (2012). The ECHR as a Living Instrument: Its Meaning and Legitimacy. SSRN,…
21. M.A. vs Slovenia 2015, 3400/07.…
22.McBride, J. (2021). The doctrines and methodology of interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights by The European Court of Human Rights. Council…
23.McQuigg, R. J. A. (2011). International Human Rights Law and Domestic Violence ‒ The effectiveness of international human rights law.…
24.Mowbray, A. (2004). The Development of Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights by the European Court of Human Rights. Oxford:…
25. Osman vs UK 1998, 23452/94.…
26. Sandra Janković vs Croatia 2009, 38478/05.…
27.Sarkin, J. (2018). A Methodology to Ensure that States Adequately Apply Due Diligence Standards and Processes to Significantly Impact Level of Violence against Women around the World.…
28.Shelton, D. (2006). Remedies in International Human Rights Law. Oxford…
29.Škorić, M. (2018). Obiteljsko nasilje u praksi Europskog suda za ljudska prava s posebnim osvrtom na presude protiv Republike Hrvatske.…
States Positive Obligations in European Law. Cambridge University Press.…
30.Stoyanova, V. (2017). Human Trafficking and Slavery Reconsidered - Conceptual…
31.Stoyanova, V. (2018). Causation between State Omission and Harm within the Framework of Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights.…
32.Stoyanova, V. (2020). Due Diligence versus Positive Obligations. In: Niemi,…
33. Tanrıkulu vs Turkey 1999, 23763/94.…
34. Tyrer vs United Kingdom 1978, 5856/72.…
35.Walby, S. & Allen, J. (2004). Domestic violence, sexual assault and stalking: Findings from the British Crime Survey.…
36.Walker, A., Flatley, J., Kershaw, C. & Moon, D. (2008). Crime in England and Wales. Home…
37.Y. F. vs Turkey 2003, 24209/94Sayfa 36
EN
TR
