KAYNAKÇA
AKKAŞOĞLU, Şeyma, “Uluslararası Tahkimde Şeffaflık”, Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi, Sayı: 152, Yıl: 2021, s. 367-413.
BARSTOW MAGRAW JR., Daniel / AMERASINGHE, Niranjali Manel, “Transparency and Public Participation in Investor-State Arbitration”, ISLA Journal of International and Comparative Law, 2009, Volume 15, No. 2, ss. 337-360.
DİNLEYİCİ, Ahmet Sefa, “ICSID Tahkiminde Hakem Heyetlerinin Türkiye’de Yürütülen Ceza Yargılamalarını Durdurma Yetkisi”,TAAD Yıl 14 . Sayı 55 . Temmuz 2023.
EGEMEN DEMİR, Işıl, ICSID Tahkiminde Kişi Bakımından Yetki, Filiz Kitabevi, İstanbul, 2014.
KARACAN Pınar, Uluslararası Yatırım Tahkiminde Şeffaflık Kavramı, Beta Yayınları, İstanbul, 2017.
Sayfa 217
SHAW Gary j “The 2022 ICSID Rules: A Leap Toward Greater Transparency in ICSID Arbitration”, ICSID Review, Vol. 00, No. 0 (2022), pp. 1–18; https://arbitration-day.law.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/content/Reading Materials/Conversation 1/ZTVQJk-siac016.pdf, E.T: 07.11.2024.
ŞANLI, Cemal / ESEN, Emre / ATAMAN FİGANMEŞE, İnci, Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk, 11. Baskı, 2024.
YILMAZ, İlhan, “ICSID KURALLARININ GELİŞİMİ VEÖNERİLEN KAPSAMLISON DEĞİŞİKLİKLER,” Galatasaray Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi , vol.0, no.1, pp.455-519, 2020.
ONLINE KAYNAKLAR
History of the ICSID Convention, Volume II – Part 1, https://icsid.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/publications/History of the ICSID Convention/History of ICSID Convention - VOLUME II-1.pdf, E.T: 30.10.2024.
Working Paper I, Volume 3 https://icsid.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/publications/WP1_Amendments_Vol_3_WP-updated-9.17.18.pdf, E.T: 31.10.2024.
Working Paper #6; https://icsid.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/documents/ICSID_WP_Six.pdf; E.T: 05.11.2024.
United Nations Convention on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State Arbitration, https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/transparency-convention-e.pdf, E.T: 07.11.2024.
UNCITRAL 3 nolu Çalışma Grubu Raporları https://uncitral.un.org/en/working_groups/3/investor-state, E.T:31.2024.
ICSID İÇTİHATLARI
Aguas Argentinas, S.A., Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona, S.A. and Vivendi Universal, S.A (Spain) v. Argentine Republic (Arg.), Order in Response to a Petition for Transparency and Participation as Amicus curiae
Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona, S.A.and Vivendi Universal, S.A. v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/19 (formerly Aguas Argentinas, S.A., Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona, S.A.and Vivendi Universal, S.A. v. Argentine Republic), (ICSID ARB/ 03/19), Order on Transparency and Amicus Curiae Petition (19 May 2005)
Sayfa 218
BSG Resources Limited v. Republic of Guinea (ICSID Case No. ARB/14/22), https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw4400.pdf; E.T: 07.11.2024.
Emilio Agustín Maffezini v. The Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/97/7, Decision on Provisional Measures (28 October 1999); https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw7939_0.pdf, E.T: 07.11.2024.
Victor Pey Casado and President Allende Foundation v. Republic of Chile (I), ICSID Case No. ARB/98/2,
Decision on Provisional Measures (25 September 2001) https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0630.pdf, E.T: 07.11.2024.
WOC Photovoltaik Portfolio GmbH & Co. KG and others v. Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/22/12, https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw18000.pdf, E.T: 07.11.2024.
IPEK INVESTMENT LIMITED Claimant and REPUBLIC OF TÜRKIYE Respondent ICSID Case No. ARB/18/18 AWARD, https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/18032.pdf, E.T: 07.11.2024.
Klesch Group and Raffinerie Heide v. Germany, Decision on Provisional Measures - 23 July 2024, https://jusmundi.com/en/document/decision/en-klesch-group-holdings-limited-and-raffinerie-heide-gmbh-v-federal-republic-of-germany-decision-on-provisional-measures-tuesday-23rd-july-2024#decision_66799, E.T: 07.11.2024.
EN
TR
