KAYNAKÇA
Akkan M., ‘Medeni Usûl Hukukunda Etkin Hukuki Koruma’, Legal Medeni Usûl ve İcra İflas Hukuku Dergisi, 2007/I, ss. 29-68.
Aktepe Artık S., Medeni Usûl Hukukunda Adil Yargılanma Hakkı, Ankara, 2014.
Aydınlı O. E., Milletlerarası Özel Hukukta Topluluk Davası, Ankara, 2023.
Aydoğan G., Anonim Şirketlerde Kamuyu Aydınlatma Belgelerinden Doğan Hukuki Sorumluluk, Ankara, 2021.
Cupa B., ‘Scattered Damages: A Comparative Law Study About the Enforcement Deficit of Low-Value Damages and the Class Action Approach’ European Review of Private Law, C. 20, S. 2, 2010, ss. 507-539.
Çelikel A. ve Erdem B. B., Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk, İstanbul, 2024.
Deren Yıldırım N., ‘Kolektif Hukukî Himaye Medeni Usûl Hukukunda Sonun Başlangıcı mı, Etkin Hukukî Himayenin Vazgeçilmez Unsuru mu? I’, Yargıtay Dergisi, C. 24, S. 1- 2, ss. 137-154. (Kollektif Hukuki Himaye I).
Deren Yıldırım N., ‘Kollektif Hukuki Himaye Medeni Usul Hukukunda Sonun Başlangıcı Mı, Etkin Hukuki Himayenin Vazgeçilmez Unsuru Mu? (II)’, Yargıtay Dergisi, C. 23, S. 91, ss. 308-322. (Kollektif Hukuki Himaye II).
Sayfa 127
Doğan V., Yılmaz, A. Ç. ve Ayhan İzmirli L., Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk, Ankara, 2024.
Eisenberg T. ve Miller G., ‘The Role of Opt-Outs and Objectors in Class Action Litigation: Theoretical and Empirical Issues’ Vanderbilt Law Review, C. 57, S. 5, ss. 1529–1567.
Ekinci A., ‘Anayasa Mahkemesi’nin Bireysel Başvuru Kararlarında Mahkemeye Erişim Hakkı’, Gazi Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi C. XVIII, S. 3-4, ss. 821-848.
Ekşi N., Yabancı Mahkeme Kararlarının Tanınması ve Tenfizi, İstanbul 2013.
European Law Institute (with input from the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights) Report on Business and Human Rights: Access to Justice and Effective Remedies 2022 (Çevrimiçi) <https://www.europeanlawinstitute.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/p_eli/Publications/ELI_Report_on_Business_and_Human_Rights.pdf> (05.04.2025) (ELI Report).
Fairgrieve D. ve Howells G., ‘Collective Redress Procedures: European Debates’ in Duncan Fairgrieve and Eva Lein (eds), Extraterritoriality and Collective Redress, Oxford, 2012.
Fallon E., ‘Holding Everyone Accountable: The Need for the Creation of an International Securities Class Action Venue in the Age of Globalized Economies’, Journal of International Business and Law, C. 21, S. 1, ss. 90-110.
Güngör G., Türk Milletlerarası Özel Hukuku, Ankara, 2023.
Halfmeier A., ‘Litigation Without an End? The Deutsche Telekom Case and the German Approach to Private Enforcement of Securities Law’ iç. Deborah Hensler et al (eds), Class Actions in Context – How Culture, Economics and Politics Shape Collective Litigation, Cheltenham, 2016.
Halfmeier A., ‘Recognition of a WCAM Settlement in Germany’, NiPR, C. 2012, S. 2, ss. 176-184. (WCAM Settlement)
Hanağası E., Davada Menfaat, Ankara 2009.
Hess B., ‘Collective Redress and the Jurisdictional Model of the Brussels I Regulation’ iç. Nuyts and Hatzimihail, Cross-Border Class Actions The European Way, 2013, Sellier.
Hess B., ‘Cross-border Collective Litigation and the Regulation Brussels I’, IPRax, C. 20 S. 2, ss. 116-121.
Sayfa 128
Higgins A., ‘Driving with the handbrake on: Competition Class Actions under the Consumer Rights Act 2015’, Modern Law Review, C. 79 S. 3, ss. 442-467.
Hodges C., The Reform of Class and Representative Actions in European Legal Systems, Studies of the Oxford Institute of European and Comparative Law V. 8, Birleşik Krallık, 2008).
Jolowicz J. A., On Civil Procedure, Cambridge, 2000.
Karaaslan V. ve Eroğlu M., ‘Kollektif Hukuki Himayenin Farklı Görünüm Şekilleri: Class Action ve Topluluk Davaları’, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, C. XIII, S. 3-4, ss. 201-221.
Karayanni M., The Private International Law of Class Actions: A Functional Approach, Volume 422 of Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, Leiden, 2021.
Kılınç Ü., ‘Mahkemeye Erişim Hakkı ve Türk Hukukunun A.İ.H.S. ile Uyum Sorunu’, İzmir Barosu Dergisi C. 2013-1, S. 128-129, ss. 126-153.
Koch H., Kollektiver Rechtsschutz im Zivilprozeß, Frankfurt am Main, 1976.
Kodek G. E., ‘Collective Redress in Austria’, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, C. 622, S. 1, ss. 86-94.
Koyuncu T., ‘Rekabet Hukukunda Tazminat Davalarının Etkinliği Perspektifinden Toplu Dava Modelleri’, Rekabet Kurumu Uzmanlık Tezleri Serisi No. 128, 2012.
Krans B., ‘The Dutch Act on Collective Settlement of Mass Damages’, Pac. McGeorge Global Bus. & Dev. L.J., C. 27, S. 2, ss. 281-301.
Mulheron R., ‘Some Difficulties with Group Litigation Orders-and Why a Class Action is Superior’, Civil Justice Quarterly, C. 24, ss. 40-68. (Some Difficulties)
EN
TR
