KAYNAKÇA
Akıncı Z, Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk (Seçkin 2020).
Akıncı Z, Milletlerarası Tahkim (Vedat 2021).
Aygül M, Milletlerarası Ticarî Tahkimde Tahkim Usûlüne Uygulanacak Hukuk ve Deliller (On İki Levha 2014).
Born G, International Commercial Arbitration (Wolters Kluwer 2021).
Blackaby N, Partasides C, Redfern A. and Hunter M, Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration (Oxford University Press 2015).
Di Brozolo Luca R, in Giuditta Cordero-Moss (ed) International Commercial Arbitration Different Forms and Their Features (Cambridge University Press 2013).
Çelikel A. ve Erdem B, Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk (Beta 2020).
Danilowicz V, ‘The Choice of Applicable Law in International Arbitration’ (1986) 9(2) Hastings International and Cooperative Law Review 235-284.
Dharmananda K, ’The Unconscious Choice Reflections on Determining the Lex Arbitri’ (2002) 19(2) Journal of International Arbitration 151-161.
Doğan V, Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk (Savaş 2020).
Sayfa 480
Doğan V, Milletlerarası Ticaret Hukuku (Savaş 2020).
Gaillard E. and Savage J, Fouchard, Gaillard, Goldman on International Commercial Arbitration (Kluwer Law International 1999).
Goode R, ‘The Role of Lex Arbitri in International Commercial Arbitration’ (2001) 17(1) Arbitration International 19-40.
Harris B, Planterose R and Tecks J, The Arbitration Act 1996 (Blackwell Publishing 2007).
Henderson A, ‘Lex Arbitri, Procedural Law and the Seat of Arbitration’ (2014) 26 Singapore Academy of Law Journal 886-910.
Kaufman-Kohler G, ‘Globalization of Arbitral Procedure’ (2003) 36 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 1313-1333.
Kobayashi H and Murakami M, Shinpan kokusai minji soshōhō (Kōbundō 2020) (小林秀之 / 村上正子 (2020). 新版国際民事訴訟法. 東京, 弘文堂).
Kojima T. and Inomata T, Chūsaihō (Nipponhyōronsha 2014) (小島武司 / 猪股孝史 (2014). 仲裁法. 東京, 日本評論社).
Mann F. A, ‘Lex Facit Arbitrum’ in P. Sanders (ed), International Arbitration: Liber Amicorum for Martin Domke (Martinus Nijhoff 1967).
Mistelis L, ‘Reality Test: Current state of Affairs in Theory and Practice Relating to Lex Arbitri’ (2006) 17(2) The American Review of International Arbitration 155-182
Nakano S, ‘Kokusai chūsai’ in Y. Honma, S. Nakano and H. Sakai (eds), Kokusai minji tedzuzukihō (Yūhikaku aruma 2021) (中野俊一郎 (2021). 国際民事手続法, 本間靖規 /中野俊一郎 / 酒井一（著）東京, 有斐閣アルマ).
Nomer E, Milletlerarası Usûl Hukuku (Beta 2018).
Nottage L, ‘Japan’s New Arbitration Law: Domestication Reinforcing Internationalisation?’ (2004) 2 International Arbitration Law Review 54-60.
Park William W, ‘The Lex Loci Arbitri and International Commercial Arbitration’ (1983) 32(1) The International and Comperative Law Quarterly 21-52.
Sayfa 481
Park William W, ‘Two Faces of Progress: Fairness and Flexibility in Arbitral Procedure’ (2007) 23(3) Arbitration International 499-504.
Pauker Saar A, ‘Substance and Procedure in International Law’ (2020) 36 Arbitration International 3-66.
Paulsson J, ‘Arbitration in Three Dimensions’ (2011) 60 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 291-323.
Petrochilos G, Procedural Law in International Arbitration (Oxford University Press 2004).
Pryles M, ‘Limits to Party Autonomy in Arbitral Procedure’ (2007) 24(3) Journal of International Arbitration 327-339.
Rubino-Sammartano M, International Arbitration Law and Practice (Kluwer Law International 2001).
Secomb M, Interest in International Arbitration (Oxford University Press 2019).
Status: UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (1985), with amendments as adopted in 2006 <https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/arbitration/modellaw/commercial_arbitration/status> Erişim Tarihi: 15 Ağustos 2021.
Şanlı C, Esen E ve Ataman Figanmeşe İ, Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk (Beta 2020).
Şanlı C, Uluslararası Ticarî Akitlerin Hazırlanması ve Uyuşmazlıkların Çözüm Yolları (Beta 2019).
Yeşilova B, ‘Tahkime Uygulanacak Hukuk (Lex Arbitri), Teorik Temelleri ve Düşündürdükleri’ (2007) 4(1) Yeditepe Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 263-350.
Yılmaz S ve Filiz Çavuşoğlu G, ‘Türk Hukukunda Tahkime Elverişlilik Kavramı ve Taşınmaz Aynına İlişkin Uyuşmazlıların Tahkimde Görülmesi’ (2019) 10(2) İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 594-613.
Sayfa 482
EN
TR
