KAYNAKÇA
Kitaplar ve Makaleler
Benedettelli, Massimo V: ‘To Bifurcate or Not to Bifurcate? That is the (Ambigous) Question’, Arbitration International, C. 29, S. 3, 2013, s. 493-506.
Dülger, Ahmet: Milletlerarası Tahkimde Hakemlerin Doğal Yetkileri, On İki Levha Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 2023.
Greenwood, Lucy: ‘Does Bifurcation Really Promote Efficiency’, Journal of International Arbitration, C. 28, S. 2, s. 105-111.
Greenwood, Lucy: ‘Revisiting Bifurcation and Efficiency in International Arbitration Proceedings’, Journal of International Arbitration, C. 36, S. 4, 2019, s. 421-429.
Gurdova, Shirin: ‘Bifurcation’, Wiki Note, Jus Mundi, 2020.
Heiskanen, Veijo: ‘Arbitrary and Unreasonable Measures’, Standards of Investment Protection, Oxford University Press, 2008, s. 87-110.
Sayfa 83
Kafalı, Ömer Faruk: Tahkim Yargılamasında Ara ve Nihai Hakem Kararları, İstanbul, On İki Levha Yayıncılık, 2022.
Kreindler, Richard/Argeri, Roberto ‘Chapter 16: “Bifurcation” of Arbitral Proceedings Considered from a Different Angle’, Arbitration As Balanced Administration of Justice, Ed. Massimo Benedettelli/Andrea Carlevaris/Antonio Crivellaro/Maria Beatrice Deli, Brill/Nijhoff, 2024, s. 308-321.
Lamb, Sophie J./Pape, Samuel/Hamzi, Laila/Scogings, Elanor: ‘Procedural Issues’, The Guide to Damages in International Arbitration, Ed. John A Trenor, S. 3, 2018, s. 125-143.
Mosquera, Rebeca E: ‘Chapter 6: Bifurcation’, The Investment Treaty Arbitration Review, Ed. Barton Legum, 7. Baskı, 2022, s. 71-81.
Trapl, Vojtěch: ‘Thinking Big-Bifurcation of Arbitration Proceedings-To Bifurcate or Not to Bifurcate’, CYIL, C. 4, 2013, s. 267-277.
Elektronik Kaynaklar
Cambridge’s British English Dictionary, Cambridge Üniversitesi Yayınları, https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/bifurcate, (25.05.2025).
Cambridge’s British English Dictionary, Cambridge Üniversitesi Yayınları, https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/bifurcation, (25.05.2025).
ICC Dispute Resolution 2020 Statistics, (çevrimiçi) https://jusmundi.com/en/document/publication/en-2020-icc-dispute-resolution-statistics, (25.05.2025).
ICC Dispute Resolution 2021 Statistics, (çevrimiçi) https://jusmundi.com/en/document/publication/en-2021-icc-dispute-resolution-statistics, (25.05.2025).
ICC Dispute Resolution 2022 Statistics, (çevrimiçi) https://jusmundi.com/en/document/publication/en-2022-icc-dispute-resolution-statistics, (25.05.2025).
ICC Dispute Resolution 2023 Statistics, (çevrimiçi) https://jusmundi.com/en/document/publication/en-2023-icc-dispute-resolution-statistics, (25.05.2025).
Oxford’s English Dictionary, Oxford Üniversitesi Yayınları, https://www.oed.com/search/dictionary/?scope=Entries&q=bifurcate, (25.05.2025).
Sayfa 84
Hakem Kararları
Azurix Corporation v. The Argentine Republic, ICSID Dava No. ARB/01/12, 14.07.2006 tarihli Hakem Kararı, https://www.italaw.com/cases/118, (25.05.2025).
Electrabel S.A. v. Republic of Hungary, ICSID Dava No. ARB/07/19, 25.11.2015 tarihli Hakem Kararı, https://www.italaw.com/cases/380, (25.05.2025).
Grynberg, RSM Production Company v. Grenada, ICSID Dava No. ARB/10/6, Aralık 2010 tarihli Karar, https://www.italaw.com/cases/93, (25.05.2025).
Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, UNCITRAL, 3 Ağustos 2005 tarihli Hakem Kararı, https://www.italaw.com/cases/683, (25.05.2025).
Mobil Oil Corporation and Others v. New Zealand, ICSID Dava No. ARB/87/2, 06.01.1988 tarihli Sorumluluk Hakkında Karar, https://jusmundi.com/en/document/decision/en-mobil-oil-corporation-and-others-v-new-zealand-none-currently-available-wednesday-15th-april-1987#decision_4509, (25.05.2025).
Philip Morris Brands Sarl, Philip Morris Products S.A, Abal Hermanos S.A. v. Uruguay, ICSID Dava No. ARB/10/7, 08.07.2016 tarihli Hakem Kararı, https://www.italaw.com/cases/460, (25.05.2025).