KAYNAKÇA
KİTAP VE MAKALELER
ACER, Yücel, “Uluslararası Adalet Divanı’nın Zorunlu Yargı Yetkisini Tanımada Çekinceler ve Geçerlilikleri”, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, Cilt.58, S.1, 2003, s. 11-27
AGO, Roberto, “Binding Advisory Opinions of the International Court of Justice”, American Journal of International Law, Cilt. 85, S. 3: 1991, s. 439-451.
AKSAR, Yusuf, Evrensel Yargı Kuruluşları, 1. Baskı, Ankara, Seçkin, 2007.
AKSAR, Yusuf, Teoride ve Uygulamada Uluslararası Hukuk-II, 6. Baskı, Ankara, Seçkin, 2021.
AYBAY, Rona, Uluslararası Yargı, 1. Baskı, İstanbul, Alfa, 2013.
AYHAN, Halis, Uluslararası Yargı, Adalet Yayınevi, Ankara, 2023.
Sayfa 138
BINGBIN, Lu, “Reform of the International Court of Justice-a Jurisdictional Perspective”, Perspectives, Cilt.5, S.2, 2004, s. 1-13.
BLEICHERT, Maura A. “The Effectiveness of Voluntary Jurisdiction in the ICJ: El Salvador v. Honduras, A Case in Point.” Fordham Intetnational Law Journal, Cilt 16, S. 3, 1992,s. 799-847.
BÜYÜK, Mehmet Emin, Uluslararası Daimî Adalet Divanı, Kararlar, Danışma Görüşleri ve Emirnameler (1922-1930), 1. Baskı, İstanbul, Beta, 2020.
GÜLGEÇ, Yahya Berkol, “Uluslararası Adalet Divanı’nın Yargı Yetkisi ve Yargı Yetkisini Genişletme Çabalarının Eleştirisi”, TBB Dergisi, Sayı. 117, 2015, s. 379-418.
İNAN, Yüksel. Uluslararası Adalet Divanının Yargı Yetkisi. Ankara iktisadi ve Ticari İlimler Akademisi, Ankara, 1982.
MERILLS, J. G., International Dispute Settlement, 4th Editon, Cambridge University Press, 2005.
ORAKHELASHVILI, Alexander, “Uluslararası Hukuk, Uluslararası Siyaset ve İdeoloji”, Çeviren: Gülcan Ergün, Uluslararası Hukuk, Teori ve Tarih, (Çeviri Editörü, UZUN, Ertuğrul), İstanbul, Pinhan Yayıncılık, 2023, s. 411-477.
PAZARCI, Hüseyin, Uluslararası Hukuk, 10. Bası, Turhan Kitabevi, Ankara, 2011.
PEHLİVAN, Oğuz Kaan, “Uluslararası Adalet Divanı’nda Görülen Davalara Dostane Katılım (AmIcus CurIae) ve Dostane Mütalaa (AmIcus BrIef) Usulü”, TAAD, Yıl 11, S. 38, 2019, s. 315-342.
SELLERS, Mortimer N. S., “The Authority of the International Court of Justice”. International Legal Theory, Vol. 8, 2002, s. 41-48.
The International Court of Justice Handbook, 2019.
THIRLWAY, Hugh, The International Court of Justice, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2016.
TÜTÜNCÜ Ayşe Nur (ve diğerleri), Toluner Milletlerarası Hukuk (Giriş, Kaynaklar), 2. Bası, İstanbul, Beta, 2019.
YASUAKİ, Onuma, “Is the International Court of Justice An Emperor Without Clothes?”, International Legal Theory, C.8, S.1, 2002, s.1-28.
ANTLAŞMALAR/ULUSLARARASI BELGELER
1899 Convention on the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes, The Hague, enacted at 18 October 1907, entered into force at 26 January 1910.).
1907 Convention for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes, adopted in The Hague, The Netherlands on 18 October 1907.
The Covenant of League of Nations, The Peace Treaty of Versailles, signed June 28, 1919, League of Nations Official Journal, February 1920.
Sayfa 139
Charter of the United Nations and Statute of the International Court of Justice, San Francisco, 26 June 1945.
Rules of Court (1978) Adopted on 14 April 1978 and entered into force on 1 July 1978.
UN, Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Paris, 9 December 1948, UNTS, Vol.78, p. 277.
UN Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Vienna on 23 May 1969. UNTS, Vol. 1155, p. 331
UN Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties Between States and International Organizations, Vienna, 21 march 1986, UNTS Vol. 2.
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, New York, 9 May 1992, UNTS, Vol. 1771, p. 107.
Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation between the United States of America and Nicaragua, 1956, Managua, 21 January 1956, UNTS, Vol. 367, p.3.
Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Against The Safety of Civil Aviation, Montreal, 23 September 1971, UNTS, Vol. 974, p. 177.
General Act for Pacific Settlement of International Disputes, Geneva, 26 September 1928, UNTS Vol. 973, s. 343.
KARARLAR
The Case of Tthe S.S. “Lotus”, Publications of the Permanent Court of International Justice, Series A. No. 70, September 7th, 1927.
Aegean Sea Continental Shelf Case, Greece v. Turkey, ICJ Reports, 1978, s.3.
Asylum Case, Colombia v. Peru, ICJ Reports, 1950, s. 266.
North Sea Continental Shelf Cases, Federal Republic of Germany v. Denmark, Federal Republic of Germany v. The Netherlands, ICJ Reports, 1969, s.3.
Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary in the Gulf of Maine Area, Canada v. United States of America, ICJ Reports, 1984, s. 246.
Frontier Dispute Case, Burkina Faso v. Mali, ICJ Reports, 1986, s. 554.
Case Concerning Land, Island and Maritime Frontier Dispute, El Salvador v. Honduras, ICJ Reports, 1992, s. 355.
EN
TR
