1. Non-Signatory As Parent Company of a Signatory (Group of Companies, Piercing the Corporate Veil)
In the case relating to engineering works on the first respondent’s oil platform…
As regards the law governing the scope rationae personae of the arbitration…
On the facts, the arbitral tribunal found that no such implicit consent was given…
In another case in this category, the arbitral tribunal faced the issue of whether…
In this case, Company A entered into a contract with Company B with the task of carrying…
At the outset, the tribunal determined the law applicable to the question of whether…
The arbitral tribunal reasoned that the “group of companies” doctrine is essentially…
The arbitral tribunal noted that, following Company B’s acquisition, Company C transferred…
Regarding the “piercing the corporate veil” doctrine, the arbitral tribunal set out…
■ the existence of complete control over the subsidiary by the dominant shareholder,…
■ the existence of a fraud, a wrong or an abuse of rights (for example when the control…
The arbitral tribunal found that Company C controlled and dominated Company B, in…