Aşağıda bir kısmını gördüğünüz bu dokümana sadece Profesyonel +
pakete abone olan üyelerimiz erişebilir.
5.7.2. How does planned obsolescence suppress innovation?
Business practices to somewhat decrease the value of products after the sale can…
The suppression of innovation is more likely a case of monopolising the aftermarket.…
This theme came up in the case of Eastman Kodak Co. v Image Technical Services in…
In the Pelikan v Kyocera, Pelikan filed a complaint against Kyocera regarding abuse of dominant position by reference to eliminate Pelikan and other rivals in the toner cartridges market in which only Kyocera’s toner cartridges are compatible with Kyocera printers. Although the Commission rejected the complaint because Kyocera was not in the dominant position in the foreclosure market, it created significant criteria that companies could be in the dominant position in the secondary market even if they are not in the dominant position in the primary market. After all, a new dominance analysis, which is regularly applied in later decisions…
It should also be noted that the Commission gave an extra definition for the aftermarket…
Switching cost creation is often a way for companies to increase their loyalty in…
“… the relevant product market is defined as the market for those products, which…
As concerns in the British Airways Plc v Commission,…
All the cases and regulations mentioned above will be discussed within the context…
In these kinds of situations, the importance of branding becomes a part of an activity…
In addition to all these, the protection of second-hand market is a significant matter…
5.7.1.2. Is it possible to benefit from the Lemon problem to conceptualise planned obsolescence?
5.7.3. Testing Article 101 TFEU in the context of planned obsolescence
EN
TR
