Sayfa 153KAYNAKÇA
KİTAP VE MAKALELER
Adam Bodnar (2014), “Res Interpretata: The Legal Effect of the European Court of Human Rights” Judgments for Other States Than Those Which Were Party to the Proceedings”, içinde Y. Haeck and E. Brems (eds.), Human Rights and Civil Liberties in the 21st Century, (Springer: Londra), 223-262.
Alastair Mowbray (2006), “Military Judges and the Right to a Fair Trial”, 6, Human Rights Law Review, 180-181.
Alastair Mowbray (2017), “An Examination of the European Court of Human Rights’ Indication of Remedial Measures”, Human Rights Law Review,17(3), 451-478.
Alexander Orakhelashvili (2005), “Assanidze v. Georgia”, 99, American Journal of International Law,99(1), 222-229.
Allice Donald ve Anna-Katrin Speck, (2019) “The European Court of Human Rights’ Remedial Practice and its Impact on the Execution of Judgments” , Human Rights Law Review, 83-117.
Amnesty International (2004), Amnesty International’s Comments on the Interim Activity Report: Guaranteeing the Long- Term Effectiveness of the European Court of Human Rights, AI Index: IOR 61/005/2004.
Andrew Drzemczewski ve James Gaughan (2010), “Implementing Strasbourg Court Judgments: the Parliamentary Dimension”, içinde Benedek vd. (ed.), European Yearbook on Human Rights, (Intersentia).
Antoine Buyse (2009), “The Pilot Judgment Procedure at the European Court of Human Rights: Possibilities and Challenges”, 57 Nomiko Vima (The Greek Law Journal), 189-1902.
Antoine Buyse, “Lost and Regained? Restitution as a Remedy for Human Rights Violations in the Context of International Law”, Heidelberg Journal of International Law (Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht),68, 129-153.
Antonio Cassese (2001), International Law, (Oxford: OUP) 185.
Arthur Henry Robertson (1961), The Council of Europe: Its Structure, Functions and Achievements (Londra: Stevens and Sons, 2nd ed).
Sayfa 154
Barbara Oomen (2016), “A Serious Case of Strasbourg-Bashing? An Evaluation of the Debates on the Legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights in the Netherlands”, The international journal of human rights,20(3), 407-425.
Başak Çalı (2016), “Towards a Responsible Domestic Courts Doctrine? The European Court of Human Rights and the Variable Standard of Judicial Review of Domestic Court Judgments”, içinde Oddný Mjoll Arnardottir & Antoine Buyse (eds.), Shifting Centres of Gravity of Human Rights Protection Rethinking Relations between the ECHR, EU and National Legal Orders, (Routledge, London).
Bertil Emrah Oder (2010), Anayasa Yargısında Yorum Yöntemleri, (Beta: İstanbul).
Bill Bowring (2019), “The crisis of the European Court of Human Rights in the face of authoritarian and populist regimes”, içinde Avidan Kent, Nikos Skoutaris, Jamie Trinidad (eds), The Future of International Courts (London: Routledge), 76-92.
Christian Tomuschat (2009), “The European Court of Human Rights Overwhelmed by Applications: Problems and Possible Solutions”, içinde Rüdiger Wolfrum ve Ulrike Deutsch (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights Overwhelmed by Applications: Problems and Possible Solutions (Berlin: Springer Verlag), 1-18.
Christine Gray (1987), Judicial Remedies in International Law, (Oxford: OUP).
Christos Pourgourides (2010), “Strengthening Subsidiarity: Integrating the Court’s Case-Law into National Law and Judicial Practice”, Conference on the Principle of Subsidiarity, 1-2 October 2010, Skopje: Macedenia. http://www.assembly.coe.int/CommitteeDocs/2010/01102010_PourgouridesSkopje_E.pdf
Christos Pourgourides (2011), National parliaments: guarantors of human rights in Europe, Doc. 12636.
Clare Ovey ve Robin White (2006), The European Convention on Human Rights, (Oxford: OUP).
Council of Europe (2002), European Ministerial Conference on Human Rights, 3-4 November 2000, Rome: Italy, (Strasbourg: Council of Europe).
Council of Europe (2011), İzmir Bildirgesi (High Level Conference on the Future of the European Court of Human Rights).
Council of Europe, Committee of Ministers, Justin Harman, (2001).Report of the Evaluation Group to the Committee of Ministers on the European Court of Human Rights. Council of Europe.
Sayfa 155
Danny Nicol (2005), “Original intent and the European Convention on Human Rights”, Public Law, 152-172.
Dilek Kurban (2008), “Türkiye’nin Yerinden Edilme Sorununun Uluslararası İnsan Hakları Kurum ve Kuruluşlarındaki Yansımaları”, içinde Dilek Kurban, Yükseker, D., Çelik, B., Ünalan, T. ve Aker, T. (eds.), Zorunlu Göç ile Yüzleşmek: Türkiye’de Yerinden Edilme Sonrası Vatandaşlığın İnşası, (TESEV: İstanbul), 114.
Dilek Kurban (2016), “Forsaking Individual Justice: The Implications of the European Court of Human Rights’ Pilot Judgment Procedure for Victims of Gross and Systematic Violations”, Human Rights Law Review,16(4), 731-769.
EN
TR
