Sayfa 308Kaynakça
Aceves, W ‘Avena and Other Mexican Nationals’ (2003) 97(4) The American Journal of International Law 923.
Baetens, F ‘The International Court of Justice renders its judgment in the Jadhav case (India v. Pakistan)’ (EjilTalk, 18 Temmuz 2019) <ejiltalk.org/the-international-court-of-justice-renders-its-judgment-in-the-jadhav-case-india-v-pakistan/> Erişim Tarihi 16 Mayıs 2021.
Buchan, R and Navarrete, I ‘The Jadhav Judgment: Espionage, Carve-Outs and Customary Exceptions’ (EjilTalk, 8 Ağustos 2019) <ejiltalk.org/the-jadhav-judgment-espionage-carve-outs-and-customary-exceptions/> Erişim Tarihi 1 Mayıs 2021.
Buys Galway, C ‘REFLECTIONS ON THE 50TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE VIENNA CONVENTION ON CONSULAR RELATIONS’, (2013) 38 Southern Illinois University Law Journal 57.
Buys, C ‘Reflections on the 50th Anniversary of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations’, (2014) 38 S ILL U L J 57.
Crook, J R ‘The International Court of Justice and Human Rights’ (2004) 1 Nw J Int’l Hum Rts 2.
Das, S and Nargas, A, ‘Mapping the Jadhav Dispute at the World Court: Evaluating India and Pakistan’s Arguments’ (2017) 48(1) California Western International Law Journal 35.
Drinan, Cara H ‘Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations: Private Enforcement in American Courts after LaGran’ (2002) 54 STAN L REV 1303.
Frowein, J A ‘Provisional Measures by the International Court of justice - The LaGrand Case’ (Max-Planck 2002) <https://www.zaoerv.de/62_2002/62_2002_1_a_55_60.pdf> Erişim Tarihi 16 Nisan 2021.
Garditz, K F, ‘Article 36, Vienna Convention on Consular Relations - treaty interpretation and enforcement - International Court of Justice - fair trial - suppression of evidence’ (2007) 101(3) American Journal of International Law 499.
Ghandhi, S ‘Human Rights and the International Court of Justice The Ahmadou Sadio Diallo Case’ (2011) 11(3) Human Rights Law Review 527.
Gowlland-Debbas, V ‘The ICJ and the challenges of human rights law’ in M Andenas and E Bjorge (eds), A Farewell to Fragmentation: Reassertion and Convergence in International Law (Studies on International Courts and Tribunals) (Cambridge University Press 2005).
Sayfa 309
Hoppe, C ‘Implementation of LaGrand and Avena in Germany and the United States: Exploring a Transatlantic Divide in Search of a Uniform Interpretation of Consular Rights’ (2007) 18(2) EJIL 317.
Janis, M ‘Individuals and the International Court’ in AS Muller and others (eds), The International Court of Justice Its Future Role after Fifty Years, (Kluwer Law International, 1997).
Javed, K ‘Right of Consular Access under the Vienna Convention Has No Exception: A Critique of Jadhav Case (India v. Pakistan)’ (2019) 50(74) Journal of Law and Society 64.
Jennings, R ‘The LaGrand Case’ (2002) 1 The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 13.
Kadish, M J ‘Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations: A Search for the Right to Consul’ (1197) 18 MICH J INT’L L 565.
Kammerhofer, J ‘The Binding Nature of Provisional Measures of the International Court of Justice: The ‘Settlement’ of the Issue in the LaGrand Case’ (2003) 16(1) Leiden Journal of International Law 67.
Kattan, V ‘Jadhav Case (India v. Pakistan)’ (2014) 114(2) American Journal of International Law 281.
Lee, L T and Quigley, J Consular Law and Practice (3nd ed, OUP 2008) 49.
Lowe, V and Fitzmaurice, M Fifty Years of the International Court of Justice (Cambridge University Press 1996).
Brown, C A Common Law of International Adjudication (OUP 2007) 209.
Mennecke, M and Tams, C J ‘Lagrand Case (Germany v United States of America)’ (2002) 51(2) The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 449.
Omer, R ‘Beyond “Winners” and “Losers”: Understanding the International Court of Justice’s Judgment in the Jadhav Case’ (Opiniojuris, 31 Temmuz 2019) <opiniojuris.org/2019/07/31/beyond-winners-and-losers-understanding-the-international-court-of-justicesjudgment-in-the-jadhav-case/> Erişim Tarihi 16 Mayıs 2021.
Peters, A Beyond Human Rights: The Legal Status of the Individual in International Law (Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law) (Cambridge University Press 2016).
Quigley, J ‘Vienna Convention on Consular Relations: In Retrospect and Into the Future’ (2014) 38 S ILL U L J 2.
Sayfa 310
Schäfer, R and Bagchi, K ‘Reflections on the International Court of Justice Decision in the Jadhav Case (India v. Pakistan): Part I’ (Opiniojuris, 25 Temmuz 2019) <opiniojuris.org/2019/07/25/reflections-on-the-international-court-of-justice-decision-in-the-jadhav-case-india-vpakistan-part-i/ > Erişim Tarihi 10 Mayıs 2021.
Schäfer, R and Bagchi, K ‘Reflections on the International Court of Justice Decision in the Jadhav Case (India v. Pakistan): Part II’ (Opiniojuris, 25 Temmuz 2019) <opiniojuris.org/2019/07/25/reflections-on-the-international-court-of-justice-decision-in-the-jadhav-case-india-vpakistan-part-ii/> Erişim Tarihi 16 Mayıs 2021.